Under Armour Clone vs Halo Golf Shoes: Which Should You Buy?
Under Armour's Clone and Halo golf shoes take different approaches to performance, despite both offering modern spikeless options. The Drive Pro Clone is built around a more adaptive, secure fit and greater support during the golf swing, while the Halo range puts more emphasis on comfortable walking, versatility and an easy-going spikeless feel.
That distinction matters when choosing a golf shoe. The best option isn't necessarily the one with the most cushioning or the most aggressive traction — it's the one that suits how you move, how you play and what you prioritise over 18 holes.
In this comparison, we'll look at the fit, cushioning, traction, stability, waterproofing and comfort of the Under Armour Clone and Halo ranges, before explaining which shoe is best suited to different types of golfer.
**
Our key finding:** The Clone is the more performance-focused choice for golfers who want a secure, supportive feel through the swing, while the Halo is better suited to golfers who prioritise comfort, flexibility and versatility.
Under Armour Clone vs Halo: At a Glance
| Feature | Under Armour Clone | Under Armour Halo |
|---|---|---|
| Best for | Golfers prioritising stability and performance | Golfers prioritising comfort and versatility |
| Fit | Adaptive, secure and more locked-in | Comfortable, supportive and more relaxed |
| Cushioning | UA HOVR + responsive cushioning | UA HOVR cushioning |
| Traction | Strong, golf-specific traction with spiked and spikeless options | UA Rotational Resistance spikeless outsole |
| Stability | Excellent – strong focus on swing support | Very good – stable without feeling overly structured |
| Waterproofing | Waterproof construction | Waterproof construction |
| Walking comfort | Very good | Excellent |
| Off-course versatility | Good | Excellent |
| Overall feel | Secure, structured and performance-focused | Comfortable, flexible and versatile |
| Best choice if you... | Want maximum support and a locked-in feel | Want one shoe for golf and everyday wear |
The biggest difference isn't simply comfort versus performance. It's how each shoe creates stability. The Clone is designed to make the foot feel more connected to the shoe, with its adaptive upper and swing-support features working together to create a secure, locked-in sensation. The Halo takes a less aggressive approach, combining a supportive construction and rotational-resistance outsole with the flexibility and comfort you'd expect from a modern spikeless shoe.
In practical terms, that makes the Clone particularly interesting for golfers who notice movement inside their shoes during the swing, while the Halo makes more sense for players who spend several hours walking and want a shoe that remains comfortable away from the course.
Drive Pro Clone: Performance and Stability First
The Under Armour Drive Pro Clone is the more performance-focused option of the two ranges, particularly for golfers who prioritise stability and a secure connection to the ground during the swing. Under Armour has built the shoe around its S3 Swing Support System, combining traction, dual-foam cushioning and lockdown features with an adaptive Clone upper designed to mould around the contours of the foot.
The result is a golf shoe with a noticeably more locked-in, supportive feel. Rather than simply making the shoe rigid, the Clone uses several elements together to control movement inside the shoe while still allowing the foot to move naturally. The Swing Support Strap and upper reinforcements are designed to help keep the foot secure through the swing, while the outsole provides additional support around the sides of the shoe.
Fit and Comfort
The Under Armour Clone is the better choice if your main priority is performance on the golf course.
Its adaptive upper is one of its biggest advantages. Rather than simply providing a conventional snug fit, the material is designed to adapt to the individual shape of your foot, helping provide support without creating uncomfortable pressure points. Testing of the Clone SL found that the upper could provide a secure fit while still allowing room around areas of the foot that can sometimes feel restricted in more structured performance shoes.
The outsole is another major strength. The Clone SL uses a combination of TPU and rubber traction elements designed to provide strong ground penetration and lateral stability, giving it a more aggressive feel than many spikeless shoes. Testing has found its outsole to be among the strongest-performing spikeless designs currently available.
That makes Clone particularly appealing if you have a powerful or aggressive swing, tend to put significant pressure through your feet during the downswing, or simply prefer a golf shoe that feels locked in rather than soft and casual.
Cushioning and Walking Comfort
Despite its performance-focused construction, the Clone isn't a hard or unforgiving shoe to walk in. It combines energy-returning UA HOVR foam with Charged Cushioning, with Under Armour designing the system to support the natural movement of the foot during the golf swing.
The cushioning therefore has a slightly different purpose from simply making the shoe feel soft. It works alongside the stability features to provide cushioning while maintaining a controlled feel underfoot.
For golfers who regularly walk 18 holes, the Clone should provide plenty of comfort, although its more structured construction means it doesn't have quite the same casual, trainer-like character that makes the Halo particularly appealing for everyday wear.
Traction and Stability
The standard Drive Pro Clone uses UA S3 spikes, developed with Softspikes and a golf biomechanist, to provide directional traction. The outsole also incorporates flex grooves and additional support around the sides, with the overall design intended to provide diagonal and lateral support during the swing.
For golfers who generate a lot of force through their lower body or who notice their feet moving during the transition and downswing, this additional grip and structure can be particularly valuable. Rather than simply asking the outsole to stop the shoe from slipping, the Clone's design is intended to help manage the movement of the foot throughout the swing.
There is also a Drive Pro Clone Spikeless version for golfers who prefer the versatility of a spikeless shoe. It retains the same Clone upper and S3 Swing Support System but replaces the spikes with a hybrid TPU and rubber outsole featuring directional traction.
Our take: If maximum traction is your priority, we'd favour the spiked Clone. If you want much of the Clone's supportive design but prefer a shoe that is easier to wear away from the course, the spikeless version makes more sense.
Waterproofing
Both the standard Drive Pro Clone and Clone Spikeless use a full waterproof membrane, with Under Armour providing a one-year waterproof warranty.
That makes the Clone particularly well suited to golfers who play throughout the year rather than restricting their golf to dry summer conditions. The waterproof construction also complements the shoe's performance focus: you're not having to sacrifice weather protection in order to get the more adaptive fit and swing support.
Who Should Choose the Clone?
The Drive Pro Clone makes the most sense if you:
• Prioritise stability and traction during the swing
• Prefer a close, secure and locked-in fit
• Generate a lot of force through your swing
• Want strong support without sacrificing cushioning
• Regularly play in wet conditions
• Prefer a performance-focused golf shoe over an everyday trainer-style shoe
Our verdict: The Clone is the better choice if your main priority is what happens to your feet during the golf swing. Its biggest strength isn't simply that it has more technology; it's that the different elements work towards the same goal — keeping your foot secure, supported and connected to the shoe while still allowing natural movement.
Under Armour Halo: What You Need to Know
The Under Armour Halo range takes a slightly different approach to the more performance-focused Clone. Rather than making the shoe feel as locked-in and golf-specific as possible, Halo is designed around a combination of walking comfort, stability and versatile spikeless traction. That makes it particularly interesting for golfers who want a shoe that feels comfortable over 18 holes but doesn't sacrifice the support needed during the swing.
There are currently two main Halo options: the Halo Hybrid Spikeless and Halo Tour Spikeless. Both use UA HOVR cushioning and UA Rotational Resistance traction, but the Tour adds a more structured support system and a fully waterproof microfiber construction.
Fit and Comfort
The Halo has a relatively straightforward, athletic fit, with both models listed by Under Armour as a regular width. The Halo Hybrid uses a waterproof textile upper with suede details, giving it a softer and more casual feel that works particularly well for golfers who want a shoe they can comfortably wear around the clubhouse or away from the course.
The Halo Tour feels more structured. Its molded microfiber upper and additional heel and underfoot support create a more secure connection to the shoe, which is likely to appeal to golfers who prefer to feel firmly supported rather than having a softer, more relaxed fit.
For golfers who walk regularly, this distinction is worth considering. The Hybrid is arguably the more lifestyle-oriented option, while the Tour puts more emphasis on secure support during the swing.
Cushioning
Both Halo models use UA HOVR cushioning within the midsole. The purpose isn't simply to make the shoe feel soft; the HOVR foam is designed to absorb impact and return energy as you move around the course.
That makes the Halo range particularly appealing to golfers who walk 18 holes. The cushioning gives the shoes a more athletic, everyday feel rather than the firm, rigid sensation sometimes associated with heavily structured golf shoes.
The important difference is that the Tour combines that cushioning with additional structural support, whereas the Hybrid prioritises a more flexible and versatile overall package.
Traction and Stability
Both Halo models use Under Armour's Rotational Resistance outsole, which provides directional traction designed around the rotational movements of the golf swing. The outsole also allows the shoe to remain spikeless, so you can comfortably walk between the car park, clubhouse and course without changing footwear.
The Halo Tour goes a step further with the UA Swing Support Stabilizer. This combines a TPU heel lock with an underfoot propulsion plate to provide additional support through the swing, while the rubber outsole wraps up the sidewall to add further stability at impact.
This creates an important distinction between the two models: the Hybrid is about versatile traction and comfortable everyday wear, while the Tour is the better choice if swing stability is a higher priority.
Waterproofing
Both Halo models are waterproof and come with Under Armour's one-year waterproof warranty. However, their constructions differ. The Halo Hybrid uses a waterproof textile upper, while the Halo Tour uses a molded microfiber upper with a full waterproof membrane.
For typical UK golf, that makes either model a practical choice, but the Tour's more comprehensive construction is better suited to golfers who regularly play in wet conditions and want maximum protection.
Which Halo Golf Shoe Should You Choose?
Choose the Halo Hybrid Spikeless if: you prioritise walking comfort, versatility and a more casual athletic feel. It's particularly appealing if you want a golf shoe that can easily transition from the course to the clubhouse and everyday wear.
Choose the Halo Tour Spikeless if: you want the Halo's comfort and spikeless versatility but place greater importance on stability and support during the golf swing. The additional Swing Support Stabilizer makes it the more performance-focused option of the two.
Overall, Halo is the better fit for golfers who want comfort and versatility without giving up dependable on-course performance. If your priority is maximum lockdown, aggressive traction and a shoe specifically engineered around swing mechanics, however, the Clone takes a more performance-first approach — which is where the comparison between the two ranges becomes particularly interesting.
Choosing Between Under Armour Clone and Halo
After looking at the two ranges individually, the choice between Under Armour Clone and Halo comes down less to which shoe has the most technology and more to what you want from your golf footwear. Both provide cushioning, waterproof protection, spikeless traction and plenty of support, but they approach those priorities differently.
The Clone is the more performance-focused option, with its adaptive upper and highly supportive outsole designed to provide a secure, connected feel throughout the swing. The Halo range takes a more versatile approach, particularly with the Halo Hybrid, combining golf-specific traction and stability with the softer, more athletic feel you'd expect from an everyday trainer.
That distinction becomes particularly important when choosing between the Clone SL and Halo Tour. The Halo Tour is considerably more performance-oriented than the Halo Hybrid, making it a much closer alternative to the Clone.
Choose the Clone If You Prioritise Golf Performance
The Under Armour Clone is the better choice if your main priority is performance on the golf course.
Its adaptive upper is one of its biggest advantages. Rather than simply providing a conventional snug fit, the material is designed to adapt to the individual shape of your foot, helping provide support without creating uncomfortable pressure points. In our assesment, the Clone SL found that the upper could provide a secure fit while still allowing room around areas of the foot that can sometimes feel restricted in more structured performance shoes.
The outsole is another major strength. The Clone SL uses a combination of TPU and rubber traction elements designed to provide strong ground penetration and lateral stability, giving it a more aggressive feel than many spikeless shoes. Testing has found its outsole to be among the strongest-performing spikeless designs currently available.
That makes Clone particularly appealing if you have a powerful or aggressive swing, tend to put significant pressure through your feet during the downswing, or simply prefer a golf shoe that feels locked in rather than soft and casual.
Choose Clone if you:
• Prioritise stability and traction during the swing
• Want a secure, adaptive fit
• Prefer a more performance-focused golf shoe
• Play regularly and want maximum on-course performance
• Don't mind sacrificing some off-course versatility for golf-specific performance
Choose the Halo If You Prioritise Comfort and Versatility
The Halo is the more natural choice if you want a golf shoe that works particularly well for walking and everyday wear as well as playing golf.
This is especially true of the Halo Hybrid, which combines a waterproof textile upper, HOVR cushioning and spikeless traction with a more casual athletic appearance. It feels less like a traditional performance golf shoe and more like a trainer that has been engineered to cope with the demands of the golf course.
The Halo Tour takes that concept further. Despite its sneaker-inspired appearance, it incorporates substantially more golf-specific support, including a heel cup and UA Swing Support Stabilizer system. Testing of the Halo Tour found that the heel provides a notably secure, locked-in feel, while the softer HOVR midsole makes it particularly comfortable for walking and off-course use.
This makes Halo a particularly good option for golfers who walk 18 holes, spend a lot of time on their feet or want to wear the same shoes from home to the course and back again.
Choose Halo if you:
• Put a high priority on walking comfort
• Want a softer, more athletic feel underfoot
• Value off-course versatility
• Prefer a casual or trainer-inspired appearance
• Want good golf performance without an overly specialised feel
Halo Tour vs Clone: The Closer Comparison
The most interesting comparison isn't actually between the entire Halo range and Clone. It's between the Halo Tour and Clone.
The Halo Hybrid sits towards the comfort and versatility end of Under Armour's golf footwear range, whereas the Halo Tour introduces considerably more swing-specific support. Its heel cup, TPU heel lock and underfoot support system give it a much more secure feel than you might expect from its running-shoe-inspired appearance.
The Clone still has the edge if maximum traction and golf-specific stability are your priorities. The Clone SL's outsole is more aggressive and designed specifically around the demands of the golf swing, while its adaptive upper provides an unusually secure fit without making the shoe feel excessively restrictive.
The Halo Tour, however, offers a different balance. It gives up some of the Clone's outright traction performance in exchange for a softer, more versatile ride. During testing, the Halo Tour was found to provide excellent stability while remaining comfortable enough to wear extensively away from the course.
Our take: If you're choosing purely on golf performance, we'd lean towards the Clone. If you're looking for the better all-round shoe that you can comfortably wear for golf, walking and everyday use, the Halo Tour makes a very strong case.
Which Under Armour Golf Shoe Should You Buy?
There isn't necessarily a single winner because the two ranges are aimed at slightly different priorities.
Choose the Under Armour Clone if you want the most performance-focused option, particularly if stability, traction and a secure fit are at the top of your list.
Choose the Under Armour Halo Tour if you want a balance of strong golf performance and exceptional walking comfort, with a more casual trainer-inspired design.
Choose the Under Armour Halo Hybrid if everyday versatility and comfort matter more than having the most aggressive golf-specific support.
The good news is that the gap between the ranges isn't as large as you might initially expect. The Halo Tour in particular demonstrates how far modern spikeless golf shoes have come: a shoe can have a soft, running-inspired feel and still provide the stability needed to make an aggressive golf swing.
For golfers who spend most of their time thinking about how their shoes perform during the swing, Clone remains the more compelling choice. For those who think about how their shoes feel during the other four or five hours surrounding the round, Halo becomes much harder to overlook.
Under Armour Clone vs Halo: Our Verdict
Both the Under Armour Clone and Halo ranges offer excellent options for golfers who want the comfort and convenience of a modern spikeless golf shoe, but they are designed with slightly different priorities.
The Under Armour Clone is our choice for golfers who prioritise on-course performance. Its adaptive fit, strong lateral support and highly capable outsole give it a more secure, performance-focused feel through the golf swing. We found the Clone SL combined adaptive comfort, traction and stability extremely well.
The Halo range is the better choice if comfort and versatility are higher priorities. The Halo Hybrid is particularly well suited to golfers who want an athletic-looking shoe that works naturally both on and off the course, while the Halo Tour offers a significant step up in golf-specific stability without losing the soft, sneaker-like feel that makes the range appealing. Testing of the Halo Tour has highlighted its unusual combination of soft cushioning, secure heel support and off-course versatility.
For us, the Halo Tour is the most interesting alternative to the Clone. It doesn't quite match the Clone's outright traction performance, but that isn't necessarily a disadvantage for the golfer it's aimed at. Its softer underfoot feel and more casual outsole make it easier to wear for extended periods away from the course, while it still provides enough stability for the demands of the golf swing.
Ultimately, we'd recommend Clone for the golfer who thinks primarily about performance during the swing, and Halo for the golfer who wants one comfortable, versatile shoe that can do everything. Neither is simply "better" — they represent two slightly different approaches to the modern spikeless golf shoe.
Are Under Armour Clone golf shoes better than Halo?
Not necessarily. The Clone is the more performance-focused range, with greater emphasis on traction, stability and a secure adaptive fit. Halo places more emphasis on comfort and versatility, particularly the Halo Hybrid. The Halo Tour sits between the two, offering strong golf performance with a softer, more everyday feel.
What is the difference between Under Armour Clone and Halo golf shoes?
The biggest difference is their overall design philosophy. Clone is built primarily around golf performance, with a highly supportive construction and aggressive spikeless traction. Halo takes inspiration from athletic running shoes and places greater emphasis on cushioning, comfort and versatility while still providing the traction and stability needed for golf.
Which is more comfortable, Under Armour Clone or Halo?
Both are designed for walking comfort, but Halo has the edge if you prefer a softer, more trainer-like feel. The Halo Tour in particular uses HOVR cushioning and has been praised in testing for its soft underfoot feel and walking comfort. Clone offers a more structured, secure sensation while still providing strong comfort.
Which is better for walking 18 holes?
Both are good choices for walking, but Halo is arguably the better option if walking comfort is your main priority. Its softer, running-shoe-inspired construction makes it particularly comfortable over long periods, while the Halo Tour maintains a good level of stability without feeling overly rigid.
Are Under Armour Clone and Halo golf shoes waterproof?
The specific waterproofing specification varies between models, so it's important to check the individual shoe rather than assuming every shoe in either range offers the same level of protection. Where waterproof membranes or waterproof uppers are specified, they provide useful protection for wet conditions, but no golf shoe should be considered completely impervious to prolonged exposure to water.
Can I wear Under Armour Halo golf shoes off the course?
Yes. This is one of the biggest advantages of the Halo range. The running-shoe-inspired design and softer rubber outsole make the Halo Tour particularly suitable for wearing away from the course, while the Halo Hybrid is designed with versatility in mind. The outsole is also more comfortable on hard surfaces than some firmer performance-oriented golf shoe designs.
Which Under Armour golf shoe should beginners choose?
For most beginners, Halo is likely to be the more versatile choice, particularly if comfort and walking are priorities. However, beginners who are already developing a faster or more aggressive swing may prefer the additional stability and traction of Clone. Ultimately, fit should be a major consideration — the best golf shoe is one that feels secure and comfortable on your foot without restricting your movement.
How do Under Armour Clone and Halo golf shoes fit?
Both the Under Armour Clone and Halo ranges are designed to provide a secure, athletic fit, but the feel is slightly different between the two. The Clone has a more adaptive, close-to-the-foot fit, with its upper designed to conform around the foot and provide a secure feel during the swing. The Halo has a more trainer-like feel, particularly the Halo Hybrid, with greater emphasis on everyday comfort and freedom of movement. The Halo Tour is more structured around the heel and offers a more secure fit for golfers who want additional stability.
